A very good crowd for today’s Oregon Eminent Domain Conference in Portland.
Here are the links to the cases and other materials that we spoke about today in our session “Inverse Condemnation and Regulatory Takings – Issues and Trends.”
Our thanks to Planning Chairs Jill Geleneau and Paul Sundermier for putting together a great program, and for inviting us to speak.
- Seventh Circuit’s taxi takings case
- California’s “entry statute” case, recently argued in the California Supreme Court
- Virginia’s entry statute case
- Arkansas Game: Supreme Court acknoweldges takings liability for less than permanent floods
- Arkansas Game on remand to the Federal Circuit
- The Katrina flooding case
- Dunn: Oregon Supreme Court blurs the line between negligence and flood takings
- Maryland on government-“caused” flooding – government inaction could lead to liability
- California App: purposely flooding property for environmental protection is a taking
- Legislative vs adjudicative exactions: cert petition filed – “best available science” is a nexus study?
- Cert denied in San Jose exaction case
- SCOTUS and California raisins
- Texas: rail authority might be liable for a taking for driving a restaurant out of business, even though the authority didn’t affirmatively condemn any of the restaurant’s property
- The Williamson County ripeness quagmire continues: SCOTUS again denies cert
- “Fees on fees,” part I: Georgia says you get both statutory fees and just comp upon abandonment
- “Fees on fees” part II: municipal lawyers, be careful about that no-bond appeal
- Alderwoods: reasonable access and the power to regulate: our amicus brief
- How Wisconsin addresses the loss-of-access issue
- North Carolina’s “map act”- clouding use, or good planning?
- California Appeals Court: “temporary no-build area” while city gets around to taking is a taking
- Nevada: project announcement and preliminary planning isn’t a taking, even if it might be a future plan to condemn
- State’s failure to pay interest on $169 of abandoned property … not a taking
The above photo was taken during the session on the Oregon Supreme Court’s Alderwoods case (link above). The opposing lawyers in that case were the presenters – great stuff!