If you were to try to predict the result in an appeal before the Ninth Circuit where the lead plaintiff is the “Alliance for Property Rights and Fiscal Responsibility,” the defendant is a municipality, and knowing nothing else, you’d probably have guessed wrong in this case.
In Alliance for Property Rights and Fiscal Responsibility v.
We don’t usually hear much from the North Dakota Supreme Court. But here’s one that may have some interest. In Reep v. North Dakota, No. 20130110 (Dec. 26, 2013), the court held that the state owned the minerals up to the ordinary high water mark on navigable rivers, and always has, since statehood, under
Here’s the Brief Opposing Motion to Affirm, filed today (Dec. 26, 2013) in Kostick v. Nago, No. 13-456.
That’s the appeal currently pending in the Supreme Court challenging a ruling by a three-judge U.S. District Court upholding the 2012 Hawaii Reapportionment Plan against an Equal Protection challenge. The Plaintiffs assert that the 2012
Check this out. In Patel v. City of Los Angeles, No. 08-56567 (Dec. 24, 2013), the en banc Ninth Circuit concluded that a city ordinance which requires hotel owners to open guest records for inspection to the LAPD without a warrant constitutes a “search,” and that doing so is a facial violation of the
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review an interesting case we’ve been following, about that big glass viewing platform over the Grand Canyon.
As we noted here, in Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC v. Sa Nyu Wa, Inc., 715 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. Apr. 26, 2013), the issues mostly involve
Here’s one for you land users which details how the very broad way Hawaii Supreme Court treats claims of jurisidictional ripeness.
In Blake v. County of Kauai Planning Comm’n, No. SCWC-11-0000342 (Dec. 19, 2013), the court held that a third-party challenge to the Kauai Planning Commission’s subidivision approval was ripe for adjudication, and that
Here’s a short one for all you appellate procedure nerds.
We all know that under the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, the timely filing of a motion for reconsideration under Haw. R. Civ. P. 59 tolls the time when a notice of appeal must be filed to “until 30 days after entry of an order
Here’s the Brief for the United States in Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States, No. 12-1173 (filed Dec. 17, 2013).
That’s the case, set for argument on January 14, 2014, in which the Court is considering the meaning of the term railroad “right of way” as used in an 1875 federal statute.
As
The Urban Lawyer, the law review produced by the ABA Section of State & Local Goverment Law has published an article which we wrote with our Damon Key colleagues Mark Murakami and Bethany Ace, Recent Developments in Eminent Domain: Public Use, 45 Urban Lawyer 809 (2013).
Here’s the Introduction to the article: