Skip to content

Menu

Robert H. Thomas logo
HomeAboutContact
RSS YouTube X/Twitter LinkedIn
Topics Archives
Search
Close
Home » Posts » No Penn Central Taking Because City Might Have Allowed Smaller Development

No Penn Central Taking Because City Might Have Allowed Smaller Development

By Robert H. Thomas on September 14, 2023
Posted in Land use law, Penn Central, Regulatory takings, Ripeness | Knick, Zoning & Planning

There’s a lot to digest in the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in Lafayette Bollinger Dev., LLC v. Town of Moraga, No. A163636 (July 19, 2023).

Lafayette Bollinger Development, LLC v. Town of Moraga, No. A163636 (Cal. Ct. App. July 19, 2023)

Print:
Like this post Like this post  
Related Posts
1694625838796-3576590088
Ohio App: No Agins Taking (No Such Thing Anymore), But There's A Penn Central Taking
October 13, 2026
PXL_20260915_175028366
"Unpacking Private Property's Bundle of Sticks" Symposium Report
September 30, 2026
CA7,jpg
CA7: Takings Claim "has something to it," But City Requiring Owner Pay Relocation Fee To Tenants Is A "Clunky" Form Of Rent Control, So You Lose
July 29, 2026

Subscribe + Follow

Subscribe by Email
RSS YouTube X/Twitter LinkedIn
Published by
Robert H. Thomas logo
RSS YouTube X/Twitter LinkedIn
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About the publisher

This blog is devoted to developments and commentary on property rights, takings, eminent domain, property rights, and land use law.

Read More

Topics

Archives

Copyright © 2006-2026, Robert H. Thomas All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo