« HAWSCT Superferry Oral Argument Live Blog | Main | Hawaii Appeals Court: Let's Go Surfin' Now, Everybody's Learning How... »
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
All upcoming and past seminars, conferences, and events here
October 20, 2010
August 6, 2010
May 6, 2010
April 30, 2010
Judge Leonard Senate Hearing (8/3/2010)
New Jersey's "Bizarre Condemnation" - Klumpp v. Borough of Avalon (NJ Supreme Court, 3/22/2010)
Columbia Eminent Domain Oral Arguments (NY Court of Appeals 6/1/2010)
Turtle Bay/Kuilima Supplemental EIS case (HAWSCT, 12/17/2009)
Atlantic Yards eminent domain abuse (NY Court of Appeals, 10/14/2009)
Ala Loop Homeowners: are state zoning laws "environmental" statutes (HAWSCT, 10/14/2009)
Briefs, articles, and documents, via JD Supra
Eminent domain abuse: County of Hawaii v. Richards, No. 28882 (HAWSCT)
Shoreline accretion amicus brief (HAWICA)
Kelo v. City of New London amicus brief (SCOTUS)
Lingle v. Chevron USA amicus brief (SCOTUS)
Ohana Kauai Property Tax merits brief (HAWSCT)
Ohana Kauai Property Tax merits brief (HAWSCT)
The Complete Guide to Zoning by Dwight H. Merriam (2005)


This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.
© 2005-2010. All rights reserved.
Thanks very much for your blogging today. It was an interesting experience. I had to leave early for a meeting so couldn't stay to the end to thank you then.
I've listened to the tape of the argument, and my guess is that they'll rule for Sierra Club on the merits, especially as the CJ (at least) may be willing to revisit Bulgo if it would otherwise stand in the way. The attorneys' fee issue is harder to call, I think. The court has suggested in other cases that a private attorney general theory might be available, but thus far they haven't seen a case where they were actually willing to apply the doctrine and award fees. We'll see if this is the one, or if instead they finally shut the window on that theory.
Posted by: Carl Christensen | December 18, 2008 at 11:29 PM