Vermont's GMO Labeling Law Challenged On Free Speech Grounds
For those of you who follow this blog for takings and land-usey issues, please bear with us as we post this about one of the other issues we track, regulations of genetically modified organisms. You know, GMO's. We'll be short, we promise.
The issue has jumped to the forefront in Hawaii (three lawsuits filed challenging two counties' anti-GMO ordinances). And elsewhere: the Vermont legislature adopted Act 120, which requires that some -- but not all -- foods were produced with genetic engineering be labeled, and which prohibits these foods from being labeled as "natural" and the like. The Vermont law has now been challenged in federal court as a violation of the First Amendment because on one hand, the labeling requirement compels speech, while on the other, the prohibition on calling it natural suppresses speech. There are also claims that the state law is preempted by federal laws, and is an interference with interstate commerce.
This blog is not legal advice. But come on man, you knew that already! Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. Nor should you rely on the posts or comments for counsel on your situation. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that, his views; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but the author.
