This is a post I wish I didn’t have to write. But I’ve just been informed that our friend and colleague, William W. Wade, Ph.D., died earlier this week.
I know many of you, like me, have known Bill for a long time. He was an economist, and not a lawyer, but he spoke
This is mostly for our 808 sisters and brothers, but the rest of you might also find it interesting as well, because it is a Chief Justice of a state supreme court talking directly (to a lawyer-interviewer) about the measures which the third branch of state government is undertaking during lockdown.
More information, including how to get your copy here.
Here’s the description:
Stringfellow Acid Pits tells the story of one of the most toxic places in the United States, and of an epic legal battle waged to clean up the site and hold those responsible accountable. In 1955, California officials approached rock quarry owner
All the law schools moving from in-person to “remote” instruction got us to remembering that way back in the day, in the early days of the internet and email (1995, so really way back*), we wrote an essay in the Journal of Legal Education about the potential effects — good and bad — that might
Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following.
No. 52 Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford County, Maryland
Issues – Constitutional Law – 1) Does a takings claim under the Maryland Constitution accrue at the time of a stayed administrative decision or at the time of a final judicial decision affirming that result? 2)
A group of property owners acquired several parcels in the Windsor, Ontario (Canada) area over the years, “with the aim of developing the lots for residential purposes.”
The city had other ideas: it wanted the area for a “natural heritage area known as the Spring Garden Complex.” The property owners believed they were entitled
An inversecondemnation.com holiday tradition, updated.
(From yesterday’s argument in a tax refund case.)
We’re not 100% certain of what the issues are in Landowners United Advocacy v. Cordova, No. 19-1126, a case argued in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit yesterday.
But from what we can gather from listening between the lines to the OA recording (and reviewing some of the District Court documents
