Skip to content

Menu

Robert H. Thomas logo
HomeAboutContact
RSS YouTube X/Twitter LinkedIn
Topics Archives
Search
Close
Home » Posts » CA6: Taking The Right To Exclude Is A Taking, But Complaint Didn’t Allege City Allowed Public To Access The Property

CA6: Taking The Right To Exclude Is A Taking, But Complaint Didn’t Allege City Allowed Public To Access The Property

By Robert H. Thomas on September 24, 2021
Posted in Regulatory takings

zzzzz

TEXT Download 21a0226p-06, No.

Golf Village North, LLC v. City of Powell, No. 20-4117 (6th Cir. Sep. 23, 2021)

Print:
Like this post Like this post  
Related Posts
DSCF3326
New Cert Petition: Is Trademark Property Subject To The Same Takings Rules As Other Private Property?
July 6, 2026
{5493DCFA-0E57-4803-B18E-D595E41AF293}
"The constitutional duty to provide just compensation arises from the act of taking private property for public use, not the formal possession of eminent domain authority." Entity Lacking Eminent Domain Power Can Be Liable For Taking Property
July 5, 2026
You are here
New Cert Petition (Ours): Can Courts Choose To Avoid Constitutional Challenges To Rent Control By Making Owners Chase Pointless Denials?
July 1, 2026

Subscribe + Follow

Subscribe by Email
RSS YouTube X/Twitter LinkedIn
Published by
Robert H. Thomas logo
RSS YouTube X/Twitter LinkedIn
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About the publisher

This blog is devoted to developments and commentary on property rights, takings, eminent domain, property rights, and land use law.

Read More

Topics

Archives

Copyright © 2006-2026, Robert H. Thomas All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo