Babe_ver1

We’re not entirely sure if this is “for real” or just an elaborate tongue-in-cheek spoof, but hey, there’s a website (“Give No Quarter!” and an invitation to “Become a Third Amendment lawyer”), a blog (“The Runt Piglet Squeals!”*), and the brief seems signed by an honest-to-goodness real lawyer and sure looks like it has a genuine CM/ECF stamp on the top, so we’re going to take it at face value.

[*The Third Amendment has been called the “runt piglet” of the Bill of Rights: short, overlooked, the butt of jokes.]

The Third Amendment Lawyers Association (ÞALA) [yes, that’s a thorn, not a “P” or a typo.] filed a short brief in the pending challenge by the Alabama Association of Realtors to the CDC’s eviction moratorium. Thanks to our colleague — a fellow Third Amendment admirer — for passing the brief along.

As you may (or more likely may not) recall, the Third Amendment provides:

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

The brief argues the moratorium violates (no surprise) the Third Amendment. Br. at 4 (“The Moratorium prohibits eviction by Owners of Soldiers.”) Why? The text of the amendment, that’s why! To wit:

  • It’s peacetime (“For purposes of the Third Amendment, the distinction between “time of peace” and “time of war” requires a formal declaration of war by Congress.”),
  • Even if it is wartime, the moratorium was not adopted as “prescribed by law” (“Assuming, arguendo, that the existence of a current AUMF constitutes a ‘time of war’, the Moratorium was not propounded in a manner prescribed by law, as required by the Third Amendment. Prescription by law requires legislative action.”).
  • Residences are houses (yeah, but as Steve Silva has pointed out, so is IHOP).
  • Non-rent paying tenants are being “quartered” in said houses (“The use of a house by a soldier for more than 24 hours may be construed as “quartering”. Contrast Estate of Bennett v. Wainwright, No. 06-28-P-S, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39631, at *20 (D. Me. May 30, 2007) (finding that use by police for less than 24 hours was not quartering).”).
  • The moratorium doesn’t exclude soldiers (“It not only does not carve out soldiers, it does not mention them.”).

That’ll do pig. Follow along. One never knows, we suppose.

Amicus Curiae Third Amendment Lawyers Ass’n’s Brief, Alabama Assn’t of Realtors v. U.S. Dep’t of Health and