Thank you if you were able to join us earlier today for ALI CLE’s webinar, “The U.S. Supreme Court and Property Rights – Murr v. Wisconsin: The ‘Larger Parcel” Issue and the Future of Regulatory Takings,” our first comprehensive look at the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on the “larger parcel” or denominator in regulatory takings, with Sara Beachy, Michael Berger, Steven Eagle, and John Groen.
Here are links to some of the materials which our speakers discussed:
- Murr v. Wisconsin, 137 S. Ct. 1933 (2017) (majority and dissenting opinions)
- Wisconsin’s regulations
- United States’ amicus brief
- Oral Argument transcript (Mar. 20, 2017)
- Oral Argument recording (Mar. 20, 2017)
- Steven J. Eagle, The Four-Factor Penn Central Regulatory Takings Test, 118 Penn. St. L. Rev. (2014)
- United States v. Lost Tree Vill. Corp., No. 15-1192 (cert. denied 2017)
- Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606 (2001)
- Gregory Alexander, Governance Property, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1853 (2012)
- Michael B. Rappaport, Originalism and Regulatory Takings: Why the Fifth Amendment May Not Protect Against Regulatory Takings, but the Fourteenth Amendment May, 45 San Diego L. Rev. 729 (2008)
- Steven J. Eagle, Property Tests, Due Process Tests and Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence, 2007 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 899 (2007)
- Robert H. Thomas, Restatement (SCOTUS) of Property: What Happened to Use in Murr v. Wisconsin? (forthcoming 2017)
- Links to other Murr resources.
Our big three-day in-person conference, where we will have more on Murr and other regulatory takings issues (as well as eminent domain and valuation), is set for Charleston, SC, January 25-27, 2018, at the Francis Marion Hotel, stay tuned for details shortly.