Could we get much more accurate and succinct in summarizing the Minnesota Supreme Court's opinion in County of Hennepin v. Laechelt, No. A190473 (Sep. 30, 2020) than the opinion's own syllabus?
In partial taking cases, evidence of construction-related interference that occurs after the date of taking is admissible to determine the extent to which the construction-related interference is a factor in the reduced market value of the remainder property.
Slip op. at 2.
We doubt it, so we won't even try. The opinion is short, and understandable. We recommend you read it all.
County of Hennepin v. Laechelt, No. A190473 (Minn. Sep. 30, 2020)
