« CA11: In Eminent Domain, There's A "Low Bar" For An Owner To Testify About The Value Of His Own Property | Main | Cal App: In Order To Have Standing To Raise An Inverse Claim For Loss Of Street Access, The Plaintiff Must Actually Own Property Abutting The Street »

August 17, 2020

comments powered by Disqus

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and land use law.

    Subscribe by e-mail.



    inversecondemnation.com

publisher

books & articles

insurance law hawaii

hawaiioceanlaw

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But come on man, you knew that already! Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. Nor should you rely on the posts or comments for counsel on your situation. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that, his views; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but the author.

    © 2005-2023. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by Typepad