We didn't quite finish posting all of the 2014 cases in our "for the blog" folder before the ball dropped, so we're going to use the next couple of days to clear that queue.
Short postings, little analysis. But we'll start 2015 off clean, we will.
First up, Buck's Inc. v. City of Omaha, No. A-13-980 (Nov. 25, 2014), in which the Nebraska Court of Appeals held that a property owner had no inverse condemnation claim when road improvements eliminated a cut in the median, which prevented left turns into the property, because the property continued to enjoy access, just not in the same manner as before.
Buck's, Inc. v. City of Omaha, No. A-13-980 (Neb. App. Nov. 25, 2014)
