This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
All upcoming and past seminars, conferences, and events here
October 20, 2010
August 6, 2010
May 6, 2010
April 30, 2010
Judge Leonard Senate Hearing (8/3/2010)
New Jersey's "Bizarre Condemnation" - Klumpp v. Borough of Avalon (NJ Supreme Court, 3/22/2010)
Columbia Eminent Domain Oral Arguments (NY Court of Appeals 6/1/2010)
Turtle Bay/Kuilima Supplemental EIS case (HAWSCT, 12/17/2009)
Atlantic Yards eminent domain abuse (NY Court of Appeals, 10/14/2009)
Ala Loop Homeowners: are state zoning laws "environmental" statutes (HAWSCT, 10/14/2009)
Briefs, articles, and documents, via JD Supra
Eminent domain abuse: County of Hawaii v. Richards, No. 28882 (HAWSCT)
Shoreline accretion amicus brief (HAWICA)
Kelo v. City of New London amicus brief (SCOTUS)
Lingle v. Chevron USA amicus brief (SCOTUS)
Ohana Kauai Property Tax merits brief (HAWSCT)
Ohana Kauai Property Tax merits brief (HAWSCT)
The Complete Guide to Zoning by Dwight H. Merriam (2005)


This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.
© 2005-2010. All rights reserved.
In Robertson v Audubon Society, environmental groups sued to prevent logging in old growth forests. Congress passed legislation addressing the lawsuits by name. Supreme Court held it was a permissible change in law, not directing results under old law.
Posted by: Charley Foster | December 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM
Bulgo v. Maui County, 430 P.2d 321, 50 Hawai'i 51 (1967)), involved legislation that enabled Maui County to replace a member of the board of supervisors who had died after his election but before the start of the term.
As with Act 2, it was patently obvious that the legalisation was drafted to apply to the particular situation in Maui County. In fact, by its terms, the legislation could only ever apply to that one situation. Nevertheless, the court ruled that so long as the law is couched in general terms applying to a class rather than a particular (in this instance) county, then it was general legislation and therefore constitutional.
Posted by: Charley Foster | December 18, 2008 at 11:36 AM
So, according to Bulgo, it's ok to violate the intent of the law?
Posted by: Jesse | December 18, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Robert,
How do we get this Cover it Live to scroll down?
Brad
Posted by: Mauibrad | December 18, 2008 at 06:06 PM
Brad,
I think I fixed it -- the scroll bar was covered up on the right side. Let me know if you don't see the scroll bar, or if there are other issues.
Robert
Posted by: Robert Thomas | December 18, 2008 at 07:37 PM
This is a great article. I have been researching Hawaii Real Estate for a little while now. It has been my dream to buy a home there. I have been browsing so many websites checking out prices and getting ideas about property info down there and I have come across http://c21allislands.com. It was such a helpful site.
Posted by: lilly adams | March 22, 2010 at 08:44 PM