« Supreme Court: Getting It Right Doesn't Matter - Statute of Limitations in Inverse Condemnation Claims Against the Federal Government is Jurisdictional | Main | 2007 Land Use in Review: CARD v. ZBA - Administrative Procedures in Land Use Cases »

January 08, 2008

2007 Land Use in Review: Venue in Declaratory Actions on Legality of Agency Rules is Jurisdictional

In Hawaii Home Infusion Assoc. v. Befitel, (No. 27256, Apr. 16, 2007), the Hawaii Supreme Court held that the venue provisions in the declaratory judgment section of the Hawaii Administrative Procedures Act, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 91-7, are jurisdictional, and such actions must be brought in the judicial circuit in which the petitioner is domiciled.  Find out why this decision is important in the land use arena by reading this post.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1062290/24942788

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 2007 Land Use in Review: Venue in Declaratory Actions on Legality of Agency Rules is Jurisdictional:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Subscribe

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2008. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad