« City Will Appeal $37 Million Inverse Condemnation Judgment to Ninth Circuit | Main | NY Sun Opinion: Columbia Pulls a Kelo »

December 19, 2007

Federal Court Dismisses Most of Maui Vacation Rental Lawsuit

Hat tip to Supreme Court of Hawaii Blog for posting a Maui County press release announcing that on December 17, 2007, the US District Court for the District of Hawaii dismissed, for failure to state a claim, most of the allegations in the lawsuit by the Maui Vacation Rental Association.  The Maui News reports the story here, and Jesse Souki amalgamates his posts on the case at his Hawaii Land Use Law blog here

Failure to state a claim means either that a cause of action alleged by the plaintiff is not recognized, or, more commonly, that the plaintiff failed to properly plead an essential element of her legal claim.

Here's the court's summary order.  When the court issues its full written order, we'll post it.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1062290/24342852

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Federal Court Dismisses Most of Maui Vacation Rental Lawsuit:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Subscribe

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


add IC to your site

latest hawaii appellate opinions

recent posts from hawaiioceanlaw

recent posts from insurance law hawaii

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2008. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad