« Federal Court Order Dismissing Maui Vacation Rental Due Process Claims | Main | Federal Court Dismisses Maui Vacation Rental Due Process Claims -- Details »

December 20, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451707369e200e54fbf4a6c8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Double Your Fun: Big Island Considering Another Planning Commission:

Comments

I analyzed whether two planning commissions are legally permissible at http://hilanduse.blogspot.com/2007/09/hawaii-county-considers-second-planning.html

Aside from the fact that it may not be permitted under the law, there are the practical implications of having more than one planning commission as opposed to advisory boards who make recommendations to the planning commission (e.g., on Oahu).

Maui County’s Maui, Molokai, and Lanai planning commissions have sometimes complicated rather than clarified land use matters since each has the power to approve land use entitlements. In smaller communities like Molokai, the planning commission has sometimes departed from the interests of their community by proposing such initiatives as making the entire island a special management area. This would have the effect of subjecting just about every landowner's use of his property to the planning commission's approval.

Good points, Jesse. Check out the link he provides for the use of the singluar "a county planning commission" in chapter 46.

For some reason, the link above doesn't seem to work, so I'm going to repost it in the body of the main post and below:

http://hilanduse.blogspot.com/2007/09/hawaii-county-considers-second-planning.html

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


events | notices

  • All upcoming and past seminars, conferences, and events here

    October 20, 2010


    As a follow up to the live panel discussion of the Supreme Court's "judicial takings" case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Envt'l Protection, the ABA will be presenting a teleconference on the case.

    I will again be moderating a panel with experts Professor John Echeverria (Vermont Law School), Jim Burling (Pacific Legal Foundation), Richard Frank (U.C. Davis Law School), and Dan Stengle (one of the attorneys who argued the case).

    More details to be posted as they become available.

    August 6, 2010


    One of the featured CLE sessions at the 2010 American Bar Association annual meeting in San Francisco was the Section of State and Local Government Law's session on the beach renourishment case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Envt'l Protection, a case involving "judicial takings" and ownership of beachfront land. The Section of Real Property, Trusts, and Estate Law co-sponsored the session.

    I moderated a panel discussing the case and its implications. Also on the panel were Professor John Echeverria (Vermont Law School), Jim Burling (Pacific Legal Foundation), Richard Frank (U.C. Davis Law School), and Dan Stengle (one of the attorneys who argued the case).

    May 6, 2010


    I presented a session on Are Courts Waking Up To Property Rights? at the Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association's Spring Seminar.

    April 30, 2010


    I moderated a presentation of the recently published book Takings International by Professor Rachelle Alterman, the Chair in Architecture/Town Planning at Technion Israel Institute of Technology.

    In addition to Professor Alterman, the panel included Professor Russell Brown (University of Alberta) and Professor Bryan Schwartz (University of Manitoba) who gave details and criticisms of Canada's approach, Professor David Callies (University of Hawaii) discussing the Asia and Pacific approaches, and Professor Tom Roberts (Wake Forest University) comparing our homegrown system.

    In a separate program on Land Use Hot Topics, I presented a paper Recent Developments in Challenging the Right to Take in Eminent Domain.

    These sessions were part of the ABA State and Local Government Law Section's Spring Meeting in Miami.

add IC to your site

latest hawaii appellate opinions

recent posts from hawaiioceanlaw

recent posts from insurance law hawaii

September 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2010. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad