« ▪ Superferry EIS Case Summary pt. II: Throwing Open The Barn Door After the Horses Have Been Let Out | Main | ▪ Land Use Round-up »

October 01, 2007

▪ Post-Kelo Cert. Petition (MiPro) Denied

The US Supreme Court has denied review to MiPro Homes, L.L.C. v. Mount Laurel Township (No. 06-1345) (docket listing here).  The question the Court was asked to review was:

Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits a municipality from taking private property for "public use" when the municipality's public use determination is ad hoc, pretextual, and not part of a comprehensive planning process.

A summary of the case, including the petition and the decisions of the New Jersey courts is posted here.

Also denied was McNamara v. City of Rittman (No. 06-1481) (docket listing here), a petition asking the court to reconsider the ruling in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), which requires a property owner to utilize available state compensation remedies prior to suing in federal court for a regulatory taking or inverse condemnation.  The Sixth Circuit's decision is here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1062290/22069166

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ▪ Post-Kelo Cert. Petition (MiPro) Denied:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Subscribe

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2008. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad