« ▪ Superferry EIS Appeal: Hawaii Supreme Court Briefs | Main | ▪ New Articles on Eminent Domain (Kelo & Midkiff) »

August 29, 2007

Nollan/Dolan Challenge to Maui's Forty Percent Affordable Housing Exaction

The Maui News reports that Maui's "workforce housing" ordinance has been challenged:

Lawyers for a Canadian condominium developer, who is seeking to build two multiunit projects in the Kamaole area, are seeking a court order to block the county from implementing the law that the developer says is defective.

The lawsuit alleges the housing policy adopted by the council last year failed to include a “close nexus” between new developments and the need for affordable housing, is “an arbitrary, unreasonable impairment” of property rights and violates due process rights.

It also charges that the county policy does not meet the standards for imposing impact fees allowed by a state law.

Complete story here.  The Maui ordinance, enacted last year, imposes a 40% to 50% affordable requirement on new housing developments. 

The Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (filed Aug. 23, 2007) is posted here.

I also discussed the ordinance earlier here and here

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1062290/21193663

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nollan/Dolan Challenge to Maui's Forty Percent Affordable Housing Exaction:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Subscribe

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2008. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad