« ▪ Eminent Domain Due Process Notice | Main | ▪ HAWSCT: Oral Arguments in Superferry/EIS Case Scheduled »

August 06, 2007

▪ Clean Water Act Post-Rapanos — Ninth Circuit's New Opinion in Northern Cal. River Watch v. City of Healdsburg

The Ninth Circuit has issued a new opinion in Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg (No. 04-15442, Aug. 6, 2007). 

The case involves the post-Rapanos standard for how "navigable waters of the United States" is defined in the Clean Water Act, and what wetlands are covered under the Act's jurisdiction.  The court summarized its decision, holding that the controlling test from the Rapanos plurality (4-4-1) decision is Justice Kennedy's "significant nexus" test:

Healdsburg discharged the sewage into a body of water known as “Basalt Pond,” a rock quarry pit that had filled with water from the surrounding aquifer, located next to the Russian River. 

The issue is whether Basalt Pond is subject to the CWA because the Pond, containing wetlands, borders additional wetlands that are adjacent to a navigable river of the United States. The district court held that  discharges into the Pond are discharges into the Russian River, a navigable water of the United States protected by the CWA. The court followed the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (1985).

The Supreme Court, however, has now narrowed the scope of that decision. See Rapanos v. United States, 126 S.Ct. 2208 (2006). In a 4-4-1 decision, the controlling opinion is that of Justice Kennedy who said that to qualify as a regulable water under the CWA the body of water itself need not be continuously flowing, but that there must be a “significant nexus” to a waterway that is in fact navigable.

In light of Rapanos, we conclude that Basalt Pond possesses such a “significant nexus” to waters that are navigable in fact, not only because the Pond waters seep into the navigable Russian River, but also because they significantly affect the physical, biological, and chemical integrity of the River.  We affirm the district court’s holding that Basalt Pond is subject to the CWA.

The opinion is posted here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1062290/20628782

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ▪ Clean Water Act Post-Rapanos — Ninth Circuit's New Opinion in Northern Cal. River Watch v. City of Healdsburg:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Subscribe

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


add IC to your site

latest hawaii appellate opinions

recent posts from hawaiioceanlaw

recent posts from insurance law hawaii

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2008. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad