« ▪ Amicus Brief in Accretion Appeal: Heads, the State Wins; Tails You Lose | Main | ▪ More on Kauai Zoning Permit Case »

May 03, 2007

▪ Kauai Zoning Permit Case Reported

Kauai's newspaper, in a story entitled "Kauai Springs operating for now," reports on a case:

“We’re in a holding pattern,” said Robert Thomas, an attorney with Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert representing Kaua‘i Springs.

In March, Kaua‘i Springs appealed the Planning Commission’s decision to deny its request for a use permit, special permit and Class IV Zoning permit.

The company had requested the additional permits after a competitor complained that it was conducting industrial activity on agricultural lands, according to Thomas.

When owner Jim Satterfield set up shop in 2004, he did so with county, state and federal approval.

Thomas said that while his client did not agree that more permits were necessary when the issue came up earlier this year, he decided to pursue them because there had not been problems in the past.

Full article here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1062290/18198618

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ▪ Kauai Zoning Permit Case Reported:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Subscribe

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2008. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad