▪ Contemplating a Rail Development Moratorium

It's appearing more and more that Honolulu's massive $4B+ rail project is on the fast track, and the City wants to control all development anywhere near the proposed project.  In additon to the technical amendment to eminent domain law noted here allowing the City to to enter into longer term leases for land it grabs by condemnation, the City Council, as reported here, here (video), and here, is contemplating enacting a moratorium on all development within 1/4 mile of the rail route, and 1/2 mile of a transit station. 

Supposedly designed to thwart land speculators anticipating the rail project, the proposal as drafted would put a halt to all development or improvement of any kind, large or small, within the noted zones. 

In addition to the usual legal problems that accompany development bans (inverse condemnation), it is not clear why the City believes a moratorium in necessary unless it plans on taking huge swaths of private property by eminent domain (which it might if it follows the usual course for mass transit projects) in excess of what is needed for the rail footprint, and leasing or selling off the overage.  If that is the case, the proposal may makes sense from the City's perspective, since it may be seeking to capture any market gain that results from the project.  But what does this mean for private property owners who now may find themselves in the path of the rail line?  Someone down at the City better go read Klopping v. City of Whittier, a decision which prohibits the government from attempting to depress the market value of property in anticipation of condemnation.