« ▪ Property Taxes and Eminent Domain | Main | ▪ 2006 Land Use in Review: Environmental Assessments, Early and Probably Often »

December 27, 2006

▪ 2006 Land Use in Review: Depends What the Meaning of "Shall" Is

When a statute or ordinance states that an agency "shall" do something, but because of practical limitations or longstanding practice the agency does something else, what will a court do about it?

Leslie v. Board of Appeals, County of Hawaii, 109 Haw. 384, 126 P.3d 1071 (Jan. 25, 2006) involved the meaning of the word "shall" in statutes and regulations and how statutory language may or may not be affected by how the government implements the law.  The decision also involved the meaning of the term "development within the SMA" as used in Hawaii's Coastal Zone Management Act.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1062290/7296463

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ▪ 2006 Land Use in Review: Depends What the Meaning of "Shall" Is:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Subscribe

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2008. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad