« GILLIAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY | Main | STATE OF HAWAI'I v. SCHAEFER »

JOU v. SCHMIDT

No 27369 (April 29, 2008)

Opinion [pdf]

OPINION OF THE COURT BY LEONARD, J.

In this secondary appeal, Provider-Appellant Emerson M.F. Jou, M.D. (Jou) appeals from the Judgment filed in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit Court) on May 23, 2005 (Judgment).  The Circuit Court ruled in favor of Insurance Commissioner J.P. Schmidt (Commissioner Schmidt), Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs of the State of Hawai'i (DCCA), and Island Insurance Company, Ltd. (Island), affirming Commissioner Schmidt's Final Order Following remand, which was filed on May 26, 2004.  Jou filed a timely notice of appeal on June 21, 2005.

On appeal, Jou argues, inter alia, that the Circuit Court erred in: (1) denying his request that the presiding judge be disqualified based on the composition of the Hawai'i Judicial Selection Commission (JSC), which included an Island employee; (2) finding that the written notice of denial of benefits mandated by Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 431:10C-304(3)(B) is inapplicable to billing disputes, as opposed to treatment disputes; and (3) finding that the payment of interest mandated by HRS § 431:10C-304(4) is inapplicable when a payment is delayed in conjunction with a billing dispute.  For the reasons discussed herein, we hold: (1) Jou failed to submit a disqualifying affidavit satisfying the statutory requirements of HRS § 601-7 and, inlight of the rules governing the conduct of the JSC, there is no appearance of impropriety requiring the disqualification of the presiding judge in this case; (2) notice of denial was required; and (3) interest was due to Jou in this case.
[footnote omitted]

about | info

  • About this blog | email the author

    RSS feed (what's this?)

    Enter your address to subscribe by email:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    The content of this blog is generated from public information available on the judiciary's web site. This blog is not affiliated with or endorsed by the appellate courts of the State of Hawaii, or the State of Hawaii Judiciary. This blog is not legal advice, and no commentary on the decisions posted is intended. Reading this blog does not make you a client of the author, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    Original content © 2005-2008.

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad