« DEL MONTE FRESH PRODUCE (HAWAII), INC. v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY | Main | COLONY SURF, LTD. v. DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PERMITTING »

IN RE CONTESTED CASE HEARING ON THE WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATION FILED BY KUKUI (MOLOKAI), INC.

December 26, 2007 (No. 24856)

Opinion [pdf]

OPINION OF THE COURT BY NAKAYAMA, J.

The present matter involves multiple appeals from the December 19, 2001 final decision and order of the Commission on Water Resource Management ("the Commission") approving Kukui (Moloka'i), Inc.'s ("KMI's") application for water use permits.  On appeal, intervenor-appellants (collectively referred to as "Appellants") Department of Hawaiian Home Lands ("DHHL"), Office of Hawaiian Affairs ("OHA"), and Judge Caparida ("Caparida") and Georgina Kuhuia ("Kuahuia") generally allege multiple violations of the Commission's public trust duties under the Hawai'i Constitution, the State Water Code ("Code"), and the public trust doctrine.  Specifically, the Appellants raise the following points of error.

. . .

For the following reasons, we hold that: (1) DHHL's reservation is a public trust "purpose" and not an "existing legal use"; (2) the Commission failed to adequately scrutinize KMI's request to divert water; (3) the Commission appeals to have placed the burden of proof on DHHL to demonstrate that pumpage at KMI's well would increase the chloride concentration at the DHHL well site; (4) the Commission's decision did not violate the precautionary principle; (5) the Commission erred by considering an untimely application; (6) KMI requested both existing and new uses; (7) pursuant to HRS § 174C-49(c), KMI may transport water from Well #17; (8) the Commission erred when it failed to consider the impact that the closing of the hotel and golf course would have on its allocation of water to KMI; and (9) the Commission impermissibly shifted the burden of proving harm to those claiming a right to exercise a traditional and customary native Hawaiian practice.

Accordingly, we vacate the Commission's December 19, 2001 final decision and order, and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

about | info

  • About this blog | email the author

    RSS feed (what's this?)

    Enter your address to subscribe by email:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    The content of this blog is generated from public information available on the judiciary's web site. This blog is not affiliated with or endorsed by the appellate courts of the State of Hawaii, or the State of Hawaii Judiciary. This blog is not legal advice, and no commentary on the decisions posted is intended. Reading this blog does not make you a client of the author, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    Original content © 2005-2008.

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad